🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising number of nations are considering similar measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and apps are "stealing our kids' youth". A law is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to approve a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged families to block their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a good starting point," stated one parliamentarian driving the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in strong research".

Previously, momentum built behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government committed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. An organization established by the loved ones of a girl who died after viewing dangerous social media material argues that a simple age ban may not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are appropriate and fit for children," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced laws mandating adult authorization for under-16s to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various politicians to copy Australia's example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Views

Beyond the West, additional states are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, world bodies strike a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

As this global conversation continues, the steps of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers internationally are no longer prepared to wait for the industry to self-regulate.