If We Are Witnessing the Death Spiral of the Cult of Attacking Play, Let’s Appreciate Its Impact.
The Journey of a Movement is often defined by clear stages.
1. The Big Idea
An inspiring figure or coaches introduce a new and transcendent idea offering a solution for struggling players.
And so it goes. Preparations are underway to challenge the establishment overseas. The gunships are circling. Conflict emerges from the out-houses. An isolated player, vulnerable, anxious, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT written on his body as a symbol, has come staggering into view and is removed under a blanket for a temporary assignment at Derbyshire.
Do you ever miss the beginning, when everything was fresh? The initial phase, of uninhibited aggression.
2. Initial Adoration
Cult leaders promise a reboot, a brighter tomorrow, camaraderie, redemption within a community united in belief in the big idea.
What did it represent at first? A team united enjoying success. Body art. Muscles. Jawlines. Peak performance vibes. Admittedly, England’s players insist Bazball doesn’t actually exist, which is funny because if it doesn’t exist, what was that spectacle?
Yet it’s clear what it is. It’s Harry Brook playing a shot so outrageous it defies description. It’s the thrill of the captain in his final form, a demeanor suggesting: thoughtful warrior, strong features, natural look, genuinely raw you wouldn’t be surprised to notice and see him playing on the ground shirtless embracing nature.
It’s Ben Duckett often seen addressing the media, out there looking like a happy little woodland creature in a waistcoat, uttering phrases such as we’re challenging norms. Certainly, the atmosphere, initially, was uplifting.
3. A New Life
Building period. Unity enforced through repetition of the cult’s slogans. These ideas can appear contradictory as a loyalty check.
Is it just me? The criticism, the fury, the feeling of letdown post-defeat seems too strong, too much. The performance was poor in Perth, as they often do in Australia. They were dominated in the field during a brief period as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, carved around by the batsman playing aggressively but smarter, adaptive to conditions, a man playing with a kind of light around him.
Now there is the criticism, the rage, the sense of English Test cricket as a kind of abomination. The opinion suggests that England don’t just need to lose, they must be humbled, to be purged, obliterated, overwhelmed by the vengeful purity of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the conventional tactics of the bowler, marking successes with a bashful smile as if receiving a rewarding prize. What impact will this have?
4. The Backlash Phase
Problems arise because of mistakes. Yet, mistakes are denied. It begins to thrive on hostility externally.
In truth, approaching the upcoming game, we’ve entered a critical juncture in the lifespan of this movement. They might succeed in Brisbane through aggressive play. More likely, failure may follow. And if they do lose it appears we could be witnessing the final stage.
Prior to that, there are two things to note about this. More than two years ago, during the initial excitement, of light and heat, I wrote an article labeling it a movement. Criticism followed, which demonstrated because everyone knows a method to show something definitely isn’t a cult is should followers react defensively denying scrutiny of the philosophy.
The developments in the last few days are equally notable. Opposition to the style is now the trend. We have a uniformly angry internet, critical analysts, images of frustrated followers overseas missing out on play, like a room full of timeshare owners seeking justice.
On the other hand, exists the larger scene of Australia’s more nuanced more culturally hard-wired exasperation with the aggressive tourists, stating, the methods you value and have developed as one way of separating yourself from others, it’s just a joke ultimately.
Here lies the truth. All movements are similar. The style was a trend as the game has its own culture. Or at least, English cricket has always been a cult, a clique, a garden party, an insular community with a long history of ceremonial past supporting it. This has always been a place where power and access are hoarded. It’s the British pastime of the British, the original sports washers. And notably, the country is a phenomenon, a structure of hidden ranks, a place that literally still has a king.
The team have been enclosed in this environment from a young age. Attempting to break free, to create a less brutal environment, they are mirroring their own experience, forming a new circle, a limited community, but now with 15 cool guys and a leader promoting authenticity provided you conform.
Live where your feet are. Confront risks. But no matter how fast and far you run, you’re always basically in the same place.
Reflecting on this, it is perhaps the moment to offer compassion for the movement, to acknowledge its merits, of which there are many. How to define it? Promoting liberation. Questioning traditions. Batting aggressively|Attacking with