🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed documentarian has become not just a filmmaker; he represents an institution, a one-man industrial complex. When he has project premiering on the PBS network, all desire an interview.

The filmmaker completed “an astonishing number of podcasts”, he notes, wrapping up of his extensive publicity circuit comprising numerous locations, 80 screenings and hundreds of interviews. “There seems to be a podcast for every citizen, and I believe I’ve appeared on most of them.”

Fortunately Burns possesses boundless energy, as loquacious behind the mic as he is accomplished while filmmaking. The veteran director has traveled from Monticello to popular podcasts to promote his latest monumental work: his Revolutionary War documentary, a monumental six-part, 12-hour documentary series that consumed the past decade of his life and debuted this week through the public broadcasting service.

Defiantly Traditional Approach

Like slow cooking in an age of fast food, this documentary series proudly conventional, more redolent of traditional war documentaries than the era of digital documentaries new media formats.

But for Burns, who has built a career documenting American historical narratives covering diverse cultural topics, the revolutionary period is not just another subject but fundamental. “I recently told collaborator Sarah Botstein recently, and she concurred: no future work will carry greater importance,” Burns contemplates from his New York base.

Comprehensive Scholarly Work

The filmmaking team plus scripting partner Geoffrey Ward referenced countless written sources and other historical materials. Multiple academic experts, covering various ideological backgrounds, provided on-air commentary together with prominent academics covering various specialties including slavery, Native American history and imperial studies.

Signature Documentary Style

The film’s approach will seem recognizable to viewers of Burns’ earlier work. Its distinctive style featured slow pans and zooms over historical images, generous use of period music and actors voicing historical documents.

That was the moment the filmmaker cemented his status; a generation later, now the doyen of documentaries, he can attract numerous talented actors. Collaborating with the filmmaker during a recent appearance, the Hamilton creator Lin-Manuel Miranda observed: “Nobody declines an invitation from Ken Burns.”

All-Star Cast

The lengthy creation process provided advantages regarding scheduling. Sessions happened in recording spaces, at historical sites and remotely via Zoom, a tool embraced amid COVID restrictions. Burns recounts the experience with performer Josh Brolin, who made time while in Georgia to record his lines as the revolutionary leader before flying off to subsequent commitments.

Brolin is joined by numerous acclaimed actors, Jeff Daniels, Morgan Freeman, Paul Giamatti, emerging and established stars, household names and rising talent, celebrated film and stage performers, international acting community, skilled dramatic performers, Wendell Pierce, Matthew Rhys, Liev Schreiber, Dan Stevens, Meryl Streep.

Burns adds: “Frankly, this may be the best single cast recruited for any project. They do an extraordinary service. They’re not picked because they’re celebrities. I got so angry when somebody said, ‘So why the celebrities?’. I go, ‘These are actors.’ They represent global acting excellence and they vitalize these narratives.”

Nuanced Narrative

Nevertheless, the absence of living witnesses, modern media required the filmmakers to lean heavily on the written word, combining personal accounts of multiple revolutionary participants. This allowed them to show spectators beyond the prominent leaders of the revolution but also to “dozens of others who are seminal to the story”, many of whom never even had a portrait painted.

Burns also indulged his personal passion for territorial understanding. “I have great affection for cartography,” he comments, “and there are more maps in this project compared to previous works throughout my entire career.”

International Impact

The production crew recorded at numerous significant sites throughout the continent and in London to document environmental context and worked extensively with historical interpreters. These components unite to present a narrative more bloody, multifaceted and world-changing versus conventional understanding.

The revolution, it contends, represented more than local dispute over land, taxation and representation. Instead the film portrays a blood-soaked struggle that finally engaged numerous countries and improbably came to embody described as “humanity’s highest ideals”.

Civil War Reality

Early dissatisfaction and objections aimed at the crown by American colonists throughout multiple disputatious regions rapidly became a vicious internal war, pitting family members against each other and neighbour against neighbour. In episode two, scholar Alan Taylor notes: “The greatest misconception regarding the Revolutionary War centers on assuming it constituted that unified Americans. It leaves out the reality that Americans fought each other.”

Nuanced Understanding

According to his perspective, the independence account that “for most of us is drowning in sentimentality and idealization and lacks depth and fails to properly acknowledge the historical reality, and all the participants and the incredible violence of it.

Taylor maintains, a revolution that proclaimed the revolutionary principle of inherent human rights; a brutal civil war, pitting Patriots against Loyalists; and a worldwide engagement, continuing previous patterns of conflicts between Britain, France and Spain for control of the continent.

Uncertain Historical Outcomes

The filmmaker also sought {to rediscover the